I just took 屈's reply as a joke, just as I take many other statements on our forum. In paticular, there are simply so many around the 'chat' zones.

The phrase 'inside story' 內幕could be interpreted liberally, and I didn't give a damn.

Of course, one is free to voice his/her query here.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:35 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-5 11:18 發表

If you really didn't give a damn, why bother to explain in here?

My response to an issue, not an explanation for others.

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-5 11:18 發表


一個 JOKE 字 就可推得一乾二淨 ?

My taking it as a joke doesn't equal a response from 屈. My response is how I saw/perceived 屈's statement, not made on his behalf.
I could be wrong, in which case it would turn out there was an 'inside story'.

You could wait for 屈 to respond, if ever. Anybody else's response does not
preempt/substitute for his.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:28 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 loksiu 於 2007-7-5 11:33 發表

I thought he didn't give a damn....

But I feel somewhat interested now that it is taken up.

Note the shift from the simple past to the simple present tense.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 11:39 編輯 ]

１

引用:

原帖由 oldgun 於 2007-7-5 11:45 發表


呢�曮}叫叻唔切，飛撲出�襄捃凗o！
咦！莫非..........................

Any reading member is free to state his/her interpretation/opinion, not least me to whom the remark in question was originally addressed. It so happens that I saw this thread early (before others to come in later), and had the time to write a bit. Members come in and leave threads spontaneously, or 'jump in(and out)' to use your words.
'叻唔切'?  What an assumption! Or could I say the one who assumes so is so himself (to borrow his words again)?

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 13:24 編輯 ]

When is 屈 going to explain?

咁屈氏尼度講左內幕中的一部份

若其它是他未能所知(由他PM xocat前後到xocat委任honeysugar), 又問唔問到其他涉其事的知情者呢?

雖屈氏認為not appropriate, 但到事已有定奪, 他向那時叫囡(更基本是網友)的honeysuga恭喜一聲, 不為怪.

xocat未必會act on 一個 moderator 既 意見掛, 何�G不只一個moderato, 相互有不同意見,
xocat本人亦係最高�巡扛�.

引用:

原帖由 Butt 於 2007-7-5 14:40 發表
老屈（屈兄），照字面睇（Done, thanks.）我懷疑xocat
誤以為你支持honeysugar申請版主，所以。。。

我懷疑xocat是: 'I have done my (exclusive)
decision making, thanks for your counter-opinion and PM (anyway) .'

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-5 14:52 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-5 15:03 發表

內幕中的一部份 ?

即係可能仲有 ?

內幕的其餘部份,
係xocat作其routine (but exclusive) decision-making時, 聽取其他advisors後(如何支持honeysugar話唔定又係內幕, 正如屈氏現在reveals佢對xocat的異議我們才知), xocat他腦內所想.  

引用:

原帖由 messenger 於 2007-7-5 17:03 發表


可否一係用全中文一係全英文呢?
NICAM轉得好辛苦呀!

okok.

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-6 00:16 發表


何�G當時聊天中, 我只係「引」白貓兒

我當時又唔受「引」

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-6 00:33 發表


又點會係謎呢?? 我提出有保留, 都起碼重有支持既聲音, 可能我把聲唔夠大掛??

你話唔想'disturb xocat �貝w',
done!

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-6 00:40 發表


多謝巴士....小弟受教
我會向 xocat 請辭版主及 moderator 一職,  避免損了大家雅興吧

個人意見:

一日xocat 同你地moderators唔界定清楚工作關係及放權問題, 一日仲有問題. 宜先檢視這方面, 若無進展你再考慮辭moderator位, 繼續做有無意思?
不過, �懦}的版主位繼續做吧.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-7-6 08:33 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 mtr613 於 2007-7-6 09:37 發表


要令到你請辭咁大件事, 我亦唔想再死纏爛打了

我只想回應 : "信差我俾彈藥你打屈臣屎" 一文
所指的彈藥, 係指理據

因你曾在 聊聊天一文內說 :


我地其中一位隱藏版網友看見 , 開了此標題 ...

我仲以為係信差自己組織資料添.

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-6 16:20 發表


Mr.gtc, please refer the following message in 申請旅遊業版主

this message is deleted by xocat as requested by the original author.  

剛重溫左

唉!

見你係休休果邊貼左喇.

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-10 12:26 發表
你係咪同我講梗呀??

梗係喇.

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-10 12:54 發表


re 我或者 quote 我嗎

我諗係尼條thread度只有我地叫佢休休之嘛

引用:

原帖由 屈臣氏 於 2007-7-10 13:49 發表
真係五體投地咯, 原來人地唔係留比自己既說話都可以 re, 唔怪得論譠話灌水係犯規 lu...