SIG GSR pistol, .45ACP

SIG Sauer P226X-Six, 9X19mm

SIG Sauer P220 Stainless, .45ACP

SIG Sauer P220ST, .45ACP

SIG Sauer P226ST, 9X19mm

引用:

原帖由 Das Reich 於 2006-10-20 01:30 AM 發表
Brother SIG:博士,原來那友仔想要"孟波"那碌的照片。 "孟波"好似是用左輪,是否就是 .44 Magnum 左輪?  先謝謝博士 你喇。

Das Reich 大哥，孟波用個支係 Colt Python 4寸長槍管 .357 Magnum 口徑左輪。

呢支槍另有 2寸， 4寸及 6寸長槍管型號。自 1955年開始生產到 2005年停產，一直係支貴價左輪，80年代初期 Smith & Wesson 推出左 M586/M686，同樣口徑，同 Colt Python 一樣有條鋼o既 underlug 於槍管底下，加大重量黎減少發射 Magnum 子彈時所產生o既強大後座力同上揚力，係 Python 最大競爭對手。

由於 Colt Python 設計落後加上價錢係 Smith & Wesson M586/M686 兩倍有多，缺乏市場，終於去年正宣佈停產。

孟波個老友 “海怪” 用o既係呢種，Smith & Wesson 口徑 .44 Magnum M29 左輪，但係 6.5寸長槍管，唔係相中呢支 4寸長。

Heckler & Koch P2000 Compact, 口徑 .357SIG

Heckler & Koch P2000, 口徑 9X19mm

Heckler & Koch P2000 Compact, 口徑 .357SIG

Kimber compact 1911, 口徑 .45ACP

SIG Sauer P226 X5 Competition， 口徑 9X19mm

SIGARMS GSR pistol with ITI M6 Tactical Light/Laser, 口徑 .45ACP

引用:

原帖由 Das Reich 於 2006-10-31 11:58 PM 發表
Brother SIG:不好意思,在下今天(31 oct)才到香港。  謝謝你的資料與圖片。  在下又再重俠聖喇。      

大哥，我都知道閣下去北上採靈G嫁啦∼∼

引用:

原帖由 aloharicnsa 於 2006-10-31 01:15 AM 發表
I would love to get my hands on a 6” Colt Python too…but because of the “collector” value – it is almost impossible to get one in US (a good condition one will be over USD $1.5K+)

Oh really?!!! Lucky we can still buy the Colt Python in HK for about 8K HK Dollar, but never mind, I'm not a Python fans and the only revolver I like is the Smith & Wesson M625, caliber .45ACP with a 5" barrel.

引用:

原帖由 aloharicnsa 於 2006-10-31 01:15 AM 發表
This is my first semi-auto that I purchased a while ago - Beretta 92 Brigadier – differences from the basic 92FS - heavier slide and 1 mm wider (or in this case – a slightly heavier pistol).

In US, the Beretta 92 FS was well-known from Lethal Weapon movies (Mel Gibson) and Die-Hard (Bruce Willis). Everyone got to have it!

Though I like the movie “Lethal Weapon” and “Die Hard” so much, the Beretta 92F (or 92FS) has never became my cup of tea.

Certainly, having a pistol with the Brigadier thicker slide I could feel safer and better, I never like any 92 series pistol except one, the Elite IA which was released in 2003.

In fact, I almost bought one 2 years ago but latter on change my mind and go ahead to get my lovely dream gun, the SIG Sauer P226!

Well, talking about the 92 series, I strongly suggest any owner of these weapons should get at least one or more of the “locking block” for spare, I’ve saw several of this part cracked and broken, within 3,000 to 6,000 rounds count.

[ 本帖最後由 SIG 於 2006-11-2 03:49 AM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 aloharicnsa 於 2006-10-31 01:15 AM 發表
Nice thing on the 92FS design is that you can have 1 (as of 1 ammo) in the chamber but the firing pin is block (as safety) – it would decrease the chance of accidental discharge (not like Glock).

I’m not trying to promote any Glock pistol and organize a “Glock Fans Club”, nor I am going to ask people to join the “Anti-Glock Association”.

I have no obligation to hard sell any Glock however Glock has THREE internal safeties (1) Drop Safety (2) Firing Pin Safety and (3) Trigger Safety, in fact it is much more safer than most of the other firearms design!

One must always understand none of the firearms will goes off by itself unless stupid people handle it in a dumb way! One of the Firearms Safety rules did mention: “NEVER PUT YOUR FINGER ONTO THE TRIGGER UNTIL YOU ARE READY TO FIRE!”

Some idiot getting too nervous when they hold the gun and pull the trigger at the wrong time, and then blame the firearms design is quite unfair!

I have a lot of videos showing shooters (all are stupid Kwai-lo) getting *Accidental Discharge*, and every gun seen in the video is NOT a Glock! It is the shooter’s fault because of “Unsafe Gun Handling”, nothing related to Glock’s design!

[ 本帖最後由 SIG 於 2006-11-2 03:58 AM 編輯 ]

It is unnecessary to compare a custom built 1911 pistol with a Glock, as they are pistols which were designed for different purpose. It is just like comparing a Italian Ferrari to a Japanese Honda!  

Certainly I knew my peak performance will be around 2% higher if I use my Wilson Custom 1911 (Hi-cap Para frame) in a match, however I have much more confidence to shoot a Glock to win. Most of the medals and trophies were won by my trusty Glocks, and in recent years, my SIG 226.

Even back in 99, before the “Production Division” had been introduced to IPSC, I lent my friend to shoot my expensive Wilson gun and I use my Glock35, I still beat him on the Standard Division!

BTW, this afternoon I received the FS magazine form USPSA, the cover is a shooter shooting a GLOCK pistol!

As I always said, it is the shooter’s skill that wins, not the gun! There’s a few words I would like to quote from the US “Front Sight Firearms Training Insitute”:

Regardless of what the unenlightened in the world may say, remember this my friend---- you are the weapon and your firearms is just a tool. Upon graduation, you will fully understand why Front Sight’s motto is, “Any gun will do---- if you will do!"

[ 本帖最後由 SIG 於 2006-11-2 03:30 AM 編輯 ]

Lastly, I don’t want to piss off any member from the “Anti-Glock Fans Club”, just a picture I want to post in here, lots of broken parts and mostly from expensive custom 1911s.

SIG Sauer P220, stainless steel, .45ACP

[ 本帖最後由 SIG 於 2006-11-2 03:48 AM 編輯 ]

Glock 21 and Glock 30, .45ACP

Glock 17 (9X19mm) and Glock 21 (.45ACP)

Glock 37, .45GAP

引用:

原帖由 aloharicnsa 於 2006-11-4 03:15 AM 發表
Di Lo Sig:

大佬，請唔好咁樣叫小弟呀，我只係個 small potato 黎嫁炸！

引用:

原帖由 aloharicnsa 於 2006-11-4 03:15 AM 發表
So for an untrained people – if he pull the trigger on a Glock, it would fire (intentionally or not) – whereas the Beretta/Sig/HP pistol … nothing happen.

You're right I've read those arguments many many times so I want to stop it after this statement. If any of my wording upset you, I apologize and buy you a drink here!

Aside the accidental discharges which I read from different sources, I had witnessed several AD myself in the past ten years, certainly I’d giving those guys a lovely DQ!

However, ALL of these cases I’d seen, none of that involved with Glock pistols, it is some pistols with manual safety, or even double action revolver!!!

We can’t say these dumb people are lack of training, most are quality and experience IPSC shooters too!

Well, I really want to ask those “well trained” people which got AD, why they put their fingers onto the trigger during drawing, moving, or worst, re-holstering???

They should have NO INTENSION to fire the weapon during that period, right?

In fact, in 1994 a local shooter even shoot his own leg.........

[ 本帖最後由 SIG 於 2006-11-23 10:36 AM 編輯 ]