引用:

原帖由 車欠石更 於 2007-8-17 23:04 發表

別自以為是，別以為不出聲等於不知情，更別以為掛著"為forum好"的旗號便可以亂說一通。高手？憑閣下也配說這兩個字嗎？閣下知道何謂高手嗎？

別撑開話題，什麼人應為此事道歉，大家心中有數，閣下認為是誰，本人亦無興趣深究。但，若無証據支持閣下中傷網友allure的話，請先向她道歉。  

閣下講的野非常有道理, 不過留番俾你自己聽番會更好

無證據支持? 睇下呀 allure 的 #13, 如果佢講的野係有乜實質證據的話, 那才算是我錯吧

引用:

原帖由 allure 於 2007-8-17 23:17 發表

你對乜生既回覆就係最 concrete既 evidence 喇...
乜生只係希望大版主可以 unban 一d乜生認為係無辜既版主o者...
你就話佢係要抗爭果個既分身... 你可以證明乜生 同 fairgame係同一個人?
我只係想息事寧人... 乜生都無再回應你喇.. 我既原意好明顯達到左...

我諗你搞錯了, 我無話過乜生同fairgame係同一個人, 我只問利記版主佢地係唔係同一個人姐.

至於乜生同fairgame係邊個的分身, 我只係問過下其他版主先至咁講,
至於佢地係邊個的分身....我諗 lu 版主你自己有check ip能力自己應該知.

仲有, 你果句「ok, i've ansewered yours, but you still haven't answered my question.
please provide concrete evidence for supporting your accusations against me!  thanks!」唔該你自己最好回應番響#13你打過d乜. 我只係覺得被人毀謗先講咁多野, 如果唔係我早就收聲了.

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 23:17 發表
閣下講的野非常有道理, 不過留番俾你自己聽番會更好

無證據支持? 睇下呀 allure 的 #13, 如果佢講的野係有乜實質證據的話, 那才算是我錯吧

http://forum.timway.com/f/redirect.php?tid=122168&goto=lastpost#lastpost
乜生: post159
yours: post 160
乜氐: post 161

has he said anything against you?  why did you keep trying to 抹黑佢?
he has been speaking very politely.

how about you?
http://forum.timway.com/f/thread-122598-1-1.html
post 7 & especially #8!!!  those are the evidences that he should not 得罪你!!!

also, i'm a vivid example now, i only tried to make the discussion a peaceful one.. but i'm being personally attacked by you!
please provide concrete evidence to your accusations against me!

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 17:44 發表

我唔知邊忽得罪你喎, 阿 lu 小姐, 做咩咁中意周圍點火?
既然有道理的何必要用分身?
唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒.
我的立場大家都有眼睇, 我係呢度一個人都唔識, 亦未見過呢度任何一個人, 唔似得你咁中意玩乜野拉關係.  

[ 本帖最後由 allure 於 2007-8-17 23:31 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 23:28 發表
我諗你搞錯了, 我無話過乜生同fairgame係同一個人, 我只問利記版主佢地係唔係同一個人姐.

至於乜生同fairgame係邊個的分身, 我只係問過下其他版主先至咁講,
至於佢地係邊個的分身....我諗 lu 版主你自己有check ip能力自己應該知.

我唔知fairgame係邊個既分身, 但我好肯定 乜生同 fairgame唔係同一個人.....

引用:

原帖由 allure 於 2007-8-17 23:29 發表

http://forum.timway.com/f/redire ... o=lastpost#lastpost
乜生: post159
yours: post 160
乜氐: post 161

has he said anything against you?  why did you keep trying to 抹黑佢 ...

閣下不斷向我提及什麼高層人士, 而且唔止一次, 係一而再、再而三咁提及, 是否要向我暗示什麼?
如果咁樣唔算係點火, 仲講到自己話人地「唔得罪得」都無問題?! 我唔似得某d人有其他人撐腰.
分身...唉, 你係版主都扮唔知? 一check ip就知, 唔使拗的.
拉關係係你講先, 明顯係妳想講我同某d呢度的高職位人士有聯繫, 既然你咁都唔認我都吹你唔脹
http://forum.timway.com/f/viewth ... =page%3D&page=1

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 17:44 發表

我唔知邊忽得罪你喎, 阿 lu 小姐, 做咩咁中意周圍點火?
既然有道理的何必要用分身?
唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒.
我的立場大家都有眼睇, 我係呢度一個人都唔識, 亦未見過 ...

要講的講晒, 有緣再會

引用:

原帖由 allure 於 2007-8-17 23:40 發表

我唔知fairgame係邊個既分身, 但我好肯定 乜生同 fairgame唔係同一個人.....

我都話左我無講佢兩個係唔係同一個人, 我只係問究竟佢兩個係唔係同一個人姐.

唉！未解決大版主既事就已經內哄, 大家有無想下被 ban 既網友重未平反
佢地睇到d post 會好唔安樂, 各位師姐師兄可以冷靜一下嗎？

糸人都知大地震之後必有餘震,
無人可以控制 , 只有在設防中耐心地等.震 震 震
好似小便完一樣 , 控制唔到 .
sorry 講解得核凸左少少出來添

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 23:43 發表
閣下不斷向我提及什麼高層人士, 而且唔止一次, 係一而再、再而三咁提及, 是否要向我暗示什麼?
如果咁樣唔算係點火, 仲講到自己話人地「唔得罪得」都無問題?! 我唔似得某d人有其他人撐腰.
分身...唉, 你係版主都 ...

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-15 13:22 發表

唉....而家有部份re 過條thread的人可以恢復番個a/c (好似XX版主咁)都係靠其他人幫佢同大版主講咋....

我仲好記得佢只係講過「唔太同意大版主的決定」咁上下, 用字仲斯文過我, 都ban

高層.. 暗示? 係你暗示先架喎!
不過, xx版主話唔想提...好.. 我就唔再提!

撐腰?? check IP? 我係版主扮唔知?
我比個IP你去check下丫? 要遂個遂個去估架!!!
你又講左一大堆無 concrete evidence support 既野喇..

引用:

原帖由 allure 於 2007-8-18 00:02 發表


高層.. 暗示? 係你暗示先架喎!
不過, xx版主話唔想提...好.. 我就唔再提!

撐腰?? check IP? 我係版主扮唔知?
我比個IP你去check下丫? 要遂個遂個去估架!!!
你又講左一大堆無 concrete evidence support 既野喇..   

唔知道你真唔知定假唔知...

你要concrete....我可以講住其中一個先....司機x.....
另一個自己搵喇

後會無期

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-18 00:29 發表
唔知道你真唔知定假唔知...

你要concrete....我可以講住其中一個先....司機x.....
另一個自己搵喇

後會無期

司機x 就係fairgame?

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 17:44 發表

我唔知邊忽得罪你喎, 阿 lu 小姐, 做咩咁中意周圍點火?
既然有道理的何必要用分身?
唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒.
我的立場大家都有眼睇, 我係呢度一個人都唔識, 亦未見過呢度任何一個人, 唔似得你咁中意玩乜野拉關係.

personal attack!  no evidence provided!

i do request a proper apology for allure, cos Orange Fai is suggesting allure is having relationship with others.
that's an extremely serious 抹黑 & Organge Fai obviously hasn't got any evidence to support what he said.
having or making relationships.. is very negative statement... and his saying did make allure feel being insulted & he's not speaking in a polite manner for sure!

引用:

原帖由 xocatII 於 2007-8-18 12:15 發表


personal attack!  no evidence provided!

i do request a proper apology for allure, cos Orange Fai is suggesting allure is having relationship with others.
that's an extremely serious 抹黑 &a ...

此次大版主處理方法始可稱為公平公正。希望該失言之網友儘快公開向allure道歉，否則，請大版主務必執行家法：ban！否則勢難服眾。

謝謝。

引用:

原帖由 車欠石更 於 2007-8-18 12:43 發表


此次大版主處理方法始可稱為公平公正。希望該失言之網友儘快公開向allure道歉，否則，請大版主務必執行家法：ban！否則勢難服眾。

謝謝。

我覺得大家用詞上可能有些少誤會

但又不至於要Ban嘛

大家一人少一句,飲返杯,下下火啦好嗎

引用:

QUOTE:
原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 17:44 發表

我唔知邊忽得罪你喎, 阿 lu 小姐, 做咩咁中意周圍點火?
既然有道理的何必要用分身?
唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒.
我的立場大家都有眼睇, 我係呢度一個人都唔識, 亦未見過呢度任何一個人, 唔似得你咁中意玩乜野拉關係.


personal attack!  no evidence provided!

i do request a proper apology for allure, cos Orange Fai is suggesting allure is having relationship with others.
that's an extremely serious 抹黑 & Organge Fai obviously hasn't got any evidence to support what he said.
having or making relationships.. is very negative statement... and his saying did make allure feel being insulted & he's not speaking in a polite manner for sure!

I offer my humble opinion.  What I said is considered in the content and context of this thread only.
I do not see any impropriety in Orange+Fai’s remarks of “拉關係”.  It is plainly saying “to foster a (good) relationship (with 高層)”.  Even to stretch my imagination to the extreme, I cannot see anything negative or insulting.  Of course, one would perceive it otherwise if he holds a subjective view.  I therefore do not consider that there is concrete evidence that the remark is a personal attack.  

[ 本帖最後由 happycamel 於 2007-8-18 17:59 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 車欠石更 於 2007-8-18 12:43 發表


此次大版主處理方法始可稱為公平公正。希望該失言之網友儘快公開向allure道歉，否則，請大版主務必執行家法：ban！否則勢難服眾。

謝謝。

閣下咁中意玩我就唔陪你晒時間喇




呵呵, 呢個世界有d人鐘意玩, 不過有d人更加中意煽

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-17 17:44 發表

我唔知邊忽得罪你喎, 阿 lu 小姐, 做咩咁中意周圍點火?
既然有道理的何必要用分身?
唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒.
我的立場大家都有眼睇, 我係呢度一個人都唔識, 亦未見過呢度任何一個人, 唔似得你咁中意玩乜野拉關係.  

引用:

原帖由 xocatII 於 2007-8-18 12:15 發表

personal attack!  no evidence provided!

i do request a proper apology for allure, cos Orange Fai is suggesting allure is having relationship with others.
that's an extremely serious 抹黑 & Organge Fai obviously hasn't got any evidence to support what he said.
having or making relationships.. is very negative statement... and his saying did make allure feel being insulted & he's not speaking in a polite manner for sure!  

xocatII, I think your statement is personal attack instead of mine.
You charge me with Personal attack because you deduce I suggest allure is having relationship with others from「唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒」or「唔似得你咁中意玩乜野拉關係」???
Is it your logic and thinking skill ?
If you find my statement is 'personal attack', then I am also suffering personal attack from allure.
I said 「唔好成日以為撻什麼高層就可以講到自己岩晒」, as allure say「佢唔係好清楚唔可以得罪你架...
求下你千祈唔好搵d高層去了解佢呀...
求下你放過佢喇...唔該晒喎    」, from your logical thinking, she is also suggesting me(Orange+Fai) is having relationship with 「高層」
I can tell you it is an extremely serious 抹黑 & allure obviously hasn't got any evidence to support what she said.
having or making relationships.. is very negative statement... and her saying did make me feel absolutely being insulted & she never, never! speaking in a polite manner for sure!!!!

[ 本帖最後由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-18 16:40 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 happycamel 於 2007-8-18 13:16 發表


I offer my humble opinion.  What I said is considered in the content and context of this thread only.
I do not see any impropriety in Orange+Fai’s remarks of “拉關係”.  It is plainly saying ...

Noted.
May I suggest that both orange fai and allure each take back the words of contention and forget about them.

[ 本帖最後由 白貓兒 於 2007-8-18 16:49 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 happycamel 於 2007-8-18 13:16 發表

I offer my humble opinion.  What I said is considered in the content and context of this thread only.
I do not see any impropriety in Orange+Fai’s remarks of “拉關係”.  It is plainly saying “to foster a (good) relationship (with 高層)”.  Even to stretch my imagination to the extreme, I cannot see anything negative or insulting. Of course, one would perceive it otherwise if he holds a subjective view.  I therefore do not consider that there is concrete evidence that the remark is a personal attack.  As such, I do not agree with XOCAT that Orange+Fai shall apologise.

Thanks your support.

I admit that my saying to allure maybe impolite, then say Sorry is OK.
However, if xocatII大版主 request....no....force me to apologize to allure due to the reason of "personal attack", then I will definitely refuse.

But what I emphasis is, when a female firstly provoke others and then she shirks all her responsibilities on another person just because from a selfish female's point of view

To these kind of unjustifiable women say sorry? Does she really don't know how to write the word "醜"

[ 本帖最後由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-18 20:56 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 happycamel 於 2007-8-18 13:16 發表


I offer my humble opinion.  What I said is considered in the content and context of this thread only.
I do not see any impropriety in Orange+Fai’s remarks of “拉關係”.  It is plainly saying ...

dear happycamel

from a female's point of view.. i'm sorry.. those statements that OF made are very negative to me.  yet, as i said before, i don't want to carry on this meaningless arguement but only waiting for an apology from OF.

to demonstrate my goodwill, i'd take his below sentence as an intention to apologise.

引用:

原帖由 Orange+Fai 於 2007-8-18 16:45 發表

I admit that my saying to allure maybe impolite, then say Sorry is OK.

yet i do hope to see his proper apology soonest.

brdgs, allure

[ 本帖最後由 allure 於 2007-8-18 18:31 編輯 ]

to my friends and others

all your supports are wholeheartedly appreciated!

please join me and wait for OF's reply.  thanks a million!

引用:

原帖由 allure 於 2007-8-18 18:24 發表


dear happycamel

from a female's point of view.. i'm sorry.. those statements that OF made are very negative to me.  yet, as i said before, i don't want to carry on this meaningless arguement ...

I regret for my lack of sensitivity and failure to consider the matter from a female's point of view.
I hope we all endeavour to refrain from making insinuating remarks.  單打will only result in misunderstanding, intended or not.


[ 本帖最後由 happycamel 於 2007-8-18 19:48 編輯 ]

In fact, I have a friend who was put in the same predicament.
Luckily the matter was resolved sensibly.

送首應景歌俾你 ,唔好學唱o咼~~~~~

累鬥累 - 劉德華

曲：徐繼宗
詞：劉德華
唱：劉德華

扮善意假裝風趣無時無地扮進取
又罵我諸多不對樣樣事潑我冷水
蠢ｏ既就有罪精ｏ既就冇罪一切未判罪
好一個諸葛後裔ｈｅｙｈｅｙｈｅｙ拒絕認罪

＊為甚麼找點根據時時撩我去鬥咀
若遇到身心交瘁為自衛我願棄車
想過累鬥累想過累鬥累諗下又有罪
蠢一世不算犯罪ｈｅｙｈｅｙｈｅｙ我信錯會降罪＊

＃日日夜夜盡力鬧丫不懼自問做人從不心虛
總有樂趣我是對我是對
最終顯示邊個有罪
日日夜夜盡力做丫不累日後便能求得安居
敢去面對我是對我是對

每種獎罰只按以後誰主宰有罪（而）被判有罪慳點眼淚
（你最終是墮進廢墟）＃

ｒｅｐｅａｔ　＊＃＃

遇幻變不可失據靜靜沉澱了再追
在面對狠狠一句學習潮浪裡寄居
不要累鬥累不要累鬥累諗下亦有罪
蠢一世不算犯罪力求進取沒有眼淚
沒有眼淚

有廿個字我喺電視入面由細聽到大, 以前覺得老套非常, 經過幾十年光景之後, 依家先至覺得佢真係有值得細味嘅地方 :

菩提本無樹
明鏡亦非台
本來無一物
何處惹塵埃

老套嗎? 喺大家打算X我或者準備回答呢一個問題之前我希望你地可以認真諗一下, 大家到底嚟呢樹究竟希望得到啲乜嘢?

無論如何, 再送七個大字俾各位網友 :

放鬆啲啦香港人~