¨Æ¥ó¼È§i¤@¬q¸¨, §Ú¦b¨º¤wÂê¤WªºÃD¥Ø¤W¤£ÂI¦W´£¨ì
¦b
¥»ÃD¤W¦³¯d¨¥»¡¬Æš¬
¡u¤â§@¥J¤u¤Ò¥N¤ä´X¦h¤j®a¶}¤ß¡v
Áö¨S¼g¬O«ü¬Æš¬VAS, ¼g¨Ó¬O·Q¤Þ¤j®aª`·N
¥h°Ý¡u¤â§@¥J¡v¬O¬Æš¬, ©Î·i¤H¥h¥Îµu°T°Ý.
Y¦³¤H¥h½èºÃ³o¼Ë»¡·|µ¹³õ³Â·Ð,
¥L¾¨ºÞ¥i¥H»¡: ¤â§@¥J§Y¬O¥Î¤â§@¯Â«ö¼¯Åo.
©ÎªÌ»¡©M¬Y§Þ®v/¬ü®e®v¡u¼ô¥ª¥i¥H.........¡v,¸ò¦í
¤S¥Î¨Ç¤£©ú®Ô¡BÁô±â¦³
double meaningªº¦r²´....
(¥i¯à¤S¬O¸Õ±´¦U¤H¤ÏÀ³, «á¨Ó¤~§ï¬°¡u¼ô¥ª¥i¥H¦n¦n¶É¡v¤@¥y¼o¸Ü)
¦¹¤H¨ä¹ê«¬I¬G§Þ,¥ý«e¤w´N¬Y¬ü®e®v»¡¡u¼ô¥ªÂIÂI¡v
³o¨Ç´N¤w¸g¥i¥O¦³Ãö¤H¤h·P¨ì¤£¦w.
²{¦b§Ú·QÁ¿¤WÓ¤ë, §Ú¦b4¥x^¤å°Q½×°Ï¦b¨ä¤¤¤@±ø™Å²ïÃD©M¨º³B¤@·|û¦³¤@¬q¹ï¸Ü,¸`¿ý¦p«á:
'your Xocat forum has caused grief for some girls, as many chings choose words with
double meanings in their reports. They often complain bitterly about being reported on.'
(§Úµª)
'There, as you can see, I have all along taken a hard line against people who attempt to allude to privacy, or ask about the possibility of the so-called 'added value', or in
one case, even
invent reports and things.
Most of us try not to make over-statements on the merits and demerits of individual bgs, toning down, playing down. If a member gets over-excited, I like to query him
without sounding contradictory.
It aint easy to draw the line but experience helps. I also listen to the very few bgs there who know me personally as who I am online.
If you noticed then, there was once an incident there where a member reported about his spa session with one of the beauticians. He wrote that he was nude apart from the underpants on him (the normal practice for the jacuzzi bath) but a 'reader' (presumably not one of us writing members) 'reported' to the beautician that nudeness bit without the qualifying underpants. She felt bad and asked the guy, who then deleted that bit. Everything was ok then, but I clarified to her with his explicit qualification and insisted in a following post that it was the one who misread and made trouble out of nothing that was to blame.
words with double meaning: I can think of a few examples.
Recently a ching commented that a bg '©Û©I¦n'. I glossed over it in passing.
Another guy earlier on said his session was 'romantic'. I couldn't help it; it was simply his fantasising character at work. But they never go on further.
Yet another member recently used the word 'attentive' (and explained that the girl took care of the air-conditioning). I liked this better

than the words '©Û©I¦n'.
More often than not, it's not newbies to a popular sauna that mention forum references to bgs out of curiosity. It's familiar customers who are non-writing members of forums that 'reported' to bgs, as if there were something worth alerting them to or they had to act to 'protect' the bgs.
But in doing so, they often, and sadly, report out of context or even misquote.
³o¨Ç¥çüL¤Æ¤F§Ú§Æ±æ¤j®a¥H«á¤Å´£§Þ®v¤Înoªºì¦].
¥ç§Æ±æ§ÚÌÄ~Äò·V¨¥¥~,
CDROM¼ô«È¤W¨ì™Å²ï¦V§Þ®v¡u¶×³ø¡v®É
¥ç·V¨¥.
[
¥»©«³Ì«á¥Ñ ¥Õ¿ß¨à ©ó 2011-1-5 09:27 ½s¿è ]